<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for mathemagicio.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mathemagicio.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mathemagicio.us</link>
	<description>Ramblings and musings about math, science and truth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:07:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fresnel integral by Mark</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/2009/07/29/the-fresnel-integral/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?p=505#comment-171</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-166&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Abel&lt;/a&gt;  Right you are. Thanks for spotting this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-166" rel="nofollow">@Abel</a>  Right you are. Thanks for spotting this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Fresnel integral by Abel</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/2009/07/29/the-fresnel-integral/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?p=505#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I believe there is a typo in &quot;the path integral along the diagonal γ2 (from the origin outward) must be equal to the integral along γ1&quot; ... maybe it should be γ3 instead of γ2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there is a typo in &#8220;the path integral along the diagonal γ2 (from the origin outward) must be equal to the integral along γ1&#8243; &#8230; maybe it should be γ3 instead of γ2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230;fool me ε times, shame on my constant-depth circuit by Mark</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/2009/02/20/fool-me-%ce%b5-times-shame-on-my-constant-depth-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?p=315#comment-165</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-163&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@dick lipton&lt;/a&gt; Thanks! Hope you don&#039;t mind me saying I&#039;m a big fan of your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-163" rel="nofollow">@dick lipton</a> Thanks! Hope you don&#8217;t mind me saying I&#8217;m a big fan of your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230;fool me ε times, shame on my constant-depth circuit by dick lipton</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/2009/02/20/fool-me-%ce%b5-times-shame-on-my-constant-depth-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>dick lipton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?p=315#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Nice job explaining his result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job explaining his result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Janet</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/about/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?page_id=2#comment-158</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a horrible person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a horrible person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8230;fool me ε times, shame on my constant-depth circuit by Dustin Wehr</title>
		<link>http://mathemagicio.us/2009/02/20/fool-me-%ce%b5-times-shame-on-my-constant-depth-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Wehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mathemagicio.us/?p=315#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Best high-level overview of Braverman&#039;s proof I&#039;ve read yet. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best high-level overview of Braverman&#8217;s proof I&#8217;ve read yet. <img src='http://mathemagicio.us/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
